|
 |
7/29/2010
Mealy-mouthed editorials
I’m almost two weeks late on this, but when the Post-Crescent defends lousy budgeting practices, it’s an important opportunity for comment.
When the Wisconsin Legislature has transferred money out of the state transportation fund to plug holes in other parts of the budget, primarily education, critics have called it a raid and blatant mismanagement.
Taking from a segregated fund to cover shortfalls elsewhere is definitely not an ideal practice. It's shortsighted and can be dangerous if done frequently enough. But it does provide the state flexibility during tough economic times. Gov. Jim Doyle said the state was able to avoid deep cuts in education due to the transfers, which have totaled $1.2 billion since 2003.
In our view, the state should not ban transfers from this fund outright, despite calls for a constitutional amendment to do so from the Outagamie County Board and at least 10 other counties that plan to host advisory referendums in November.
…. While it's best to limit transportation money for bridges and roads, if the state has a glaring need someplace else, the Legislature should have the authority to dip into that fund.
That’s ridiculous. And bad policy. A segregated fund is a segregated fund. If there’s a “glaring need” (whose glaring need?), priorities need be ranked and funds gleaned outside of segregated funds. Now, I suppose we can grant the P-C a bit of slack in that a few days after the writing of this piece, the State Supreme Court declared the transfer from the Patients Compensation Fund unconstitutional. That’s a horse of a slightly different color, though surely wasn’t a tough one to see coming down the road.
As always, the Post-Crescent tempers its remarks with a “however…”
…. That being said, the Legislature needs to get a better handle on managing the state budget. Taking from the transportation fund should be a measure of last resort.
Duh. I guess. A mealy-mouthed editorial. And that’s your oxymoron for the day.
Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net
COMMENTS
I wonder why funds should be consindered segregated at all? Money is fungible. If a fee or tax is collected to offset a service and that service is not used or serves no purpose then the fee should be discontinued.
Dean Weichmann (Thu Jul 29 08:04:09 2010)
The state taxpayers have the government they deserve, as do those who support our pay-to-play system of government.
Funds that should be paying for schools and infrastructure have been given to special interests that fund the elections, and now you are complaining??? Get over it.
Jack Lohman (Thu Jul 29 08:20:03 2010)
As long as raising taxes or cutting services are politically infeasible this state (and others) will go from short term fix to short term fix. No different than the Feds who borrow from the social security trust fund. No one is willing to sacrifice their income for taxes or sacrifice their services. Period. And the politicians know it. Come up with a budget that raises taxes across the board and cuts services across the board and see what you get.
dave allen (Thu Jul 29 08:26:04 2010)
Perhaps it would be useful to introduce legislation that forbids the state to levy taxes or fees to cover budget shortfalls, and instead draws those funds from the legislative payroll, which is adjusted accordingly. And further that any budget surpluses be paid in full back to the taxpayers in percentages reciprocal to their previous year's tax bracket, while any unused programs/services are automatically discontinued and any funds designated for those programs/services are considered surplus. Why not make the people running the government the ones to foot the bill for their stupidity, ineptitude, or outright chicanery? It's the only job that continues to pay regardless of performance.
Andrew Ellis (Thu Jul 29 10:43:11 2010)
Indeed, Andrew. I agree 100% and have written about that at Politicians must have skin in the game.
Jack Lohman (Thu Jul 29 10:59:08 2010)
The demands put on legislators today are huge. Gone are the days where a legislator could maintain a true part time position and devote their time to the citizens as a public service for no pay. Legislators need to be paid. If you don't pay them you'll get either the corrupt or the independently wealthy. The citizens need to speak with their legislators, in person and at every meeting to get the voices heard. In the end, no law will force legislators to do what is right (whatever you think is right) only we the people can by being involved, knowledgeable, and vocal.
dave allen (Thu Jul 29 11:24:34 2010)
Dave, with a pay-for-performance system I'd pay legislators twice their salary if they'd reduce spending and taxes and eliminated the "legal" corruption. Illegal corruption still enlists jail time.
Jack Lohman (Thu Jul 29 11:29:47 2010)
The irony in this is that the state has mandated to counties and municipalities that they follow GAAP(Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) which does not allow them to transfer funds from segrated accounts.
In Outagamie County as in other counties, you cannot take money from a segrated fund(Landfill and the Airport are good examples) and put it into the general fund.
The state, however, has not policed themselves by adopting GAAP and continues to play games. In other words, "Do as I say and not as I do."
We would not be having this discussion if they had to abide by the same rules as everyone else. You should be asking your legislator or potential legislator what they are going to do about this discrepency and vote accordingly.
Mike
Mike Thomas (Thu Jul 29 13:38:51 2010)
And this is in the new financial bill? Wow. I can't wait to see the unintended consequences...
H.R. 4336: Fiscal Responsibility Act -- To provide that pay for Members of Congress be reduced following any fiscal year in which there is a Federal deficit.
Provides that, if there is a deficit in a fiscal year, then:
(1) any pay adjustment (including a cost of living adjustment) for Members of Congress scheduled to take effect in the succeeding calendar year shall be null and void; and
(2) rates of pay for Members shall be reduced by a specified percentage, but not below zero.
Specifies the mandatory pay rate reduction at:
(1) 5%, for the first year; or
(2) 10%, for any consecutive subsequent year that expenditures exceed revenues.Specifies conditions for restoration of the original pay rate, together with otherwise scheduled adjustments. Vests authority in the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to make determinations of whether or not a deficit exists in any fiscal year. States that, in making any such determination, the Director shall exclude any budget outlays which directly relate to a military conflict that lasts over 30 days or that is in direct response to a terrorist attack on the United States.
http://dailybail.com/home/check-out-hr-4336-maybe-the-greatest-bill-in-congressional-h.html
Jack Lohman (Thu Jul 29 14:21:10 2010)
Wait a minute. I don't think that was from "the new financial bill..."
http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR04336:@@@L&summ2=m&
Jack Lohman (Thu Jul 29 14:56:59 2010)
By the way, could you explain what "mealy mouthed" means?
Dean Weichmann (Sat Jul 31 09:28:08 2010)
Mealy-mouthed, per Egelhoff: A mushy definition, a mushy determination. Not taking a firm position on an issue - or taking both positions on an issue...
Jo (Sat Jul 31 13:39:39 2010)
Thanks for the explaination Jo.
I can't help but observe that you show a tendency to see the world in black and white and do not appreciate opinions that see the gray.
Dean Weichmann (Sat Jul 31 20:30:00 2010)
Accounting is mostly black and white - shouldn't be much gray. When a citizenry is talking about a municipal or state budget - or a family budget, for that matter - a "gray" policy is not good public policy.
Jo (Sat Jul 31 21:12:23 2010)
No trade-offs? Balance? Come on. Ours is not an "off-on" digital world.
Jack Lohman (Sun Aug 01 10:22:08 2010)
Jo, I agree that accounting is an issue that is "black and white" but we are talking about policy, not accounting.
Dean Weichmann (Mon Aug 02 07:37:52 2010)
Dean and Jack: We are talking about a budget. A policy that is meant to aid in wise, concise, balanced budgeting.
Jo (Mon Aug 02 08:06:06 2010)
Jo, we will never have "wise, concise, balanced budgeting" as long as the special interests want us to give them taxpayer money rather than spend it on schools and infrastructure. But we've been over that before.
Jack Lohman (Mon Aug 02 12:15:24 2010)
|
|
Blog Archives
| 2010 |
  September
|
August
|
July
|
June
|
May
|
April
|
March
|
February
|
January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
December
|
November
|
October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
September
|
August
|
July
|
June
|
May
|
April
|
March
|
February
|
January
|
| 2008 |
December
|
November
|
October
|
September
|
August
|
July
|
June
|
May
|
April
|
March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
February
|
January
|
| 2007 |
December
|
November
|
October
|
September
|
August
|
July
|
June
|
May
|
April
|
March
|
February
|
January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
December
|
November
|
October
|
September
|
| 2000 |
May
|
|
