|
 |


12/20/2007
Here we go again with the earmark stuff
Are we for ‘em or agin’ ‘em? If earmarks are so terrible, why do our representatives jump to the typewriter and tell us all about them the minute they pass?
I wrote about it back in July – When is a pig not a pig? Well, of course, it’s not a pig if it’s money that benefits you.
So yesterday afternoon’s press releases put a rosy spin on it all – “Kagen delivers for northeast Wisconsin …. The measure includes a number of projects in Northeast Wisconsin critical to the health, safety and economic well-being of the people of Wisconsin.” (I won’t reproduce the list here – it’s in the release – 25 items totaling almost $19 million.)
Senator Kohl’s office issued no less than eleven releases, all in the space of a half hour after 4:30 p.m. yesterday. Headlines like: - Kohl includes $500,000 for community health care….
- Kohl directs funding to Wisconsin dental health programs
- Kohl secures $2.2M for Wisconsin Wld Waterways Project
- $1.47M investment for Walnut St. redevelopment in Green Bay…
- Kohl secures $10.7M for Green Bay area waterway….
And on and on it went.
Congressman Petri issued a similar, though much toned down, release.
On the other side of the issue, Congressman Sensenbrenner was indignant at the brazen “half-trillion dollar behemoth of a bill…”
Today’s NY Times includes a brief, but must-read analysis of the whole earmark and budget debacle. Almost 9,000 earmarks, many not ever read by anyone but the congressmen’s staffers, included in something like a 1,350 page document. Grrrrr. “I can’t wait to put out a press release to tell people what I have done,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate and an earmarker of long standing.
Earmarks served another purpose besides granting bragging rights back home. Lawmakers of both parties say the $555 billion spending measure, which provided $70 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan along with the money for nearly every federal agency, could not have been approved without the incentives provided by little things like $7.5 million to stage the Special Olympics in Boise.
“If they had taken the earmarks out, it would not have passed,” said Representative Mike Simpson, the Idaho Republican who won the Special Olympics money and ended up backing the bill that his own party leadership portrayed as excessive.
“Addictions are hard to break,” said Senator Jim DeMint, Republican of South Carolina, who had to concede that many of his colleagues were just not ready to join him in taking the anti-earmark pledge.
Of course, Representative Kagen’s announcement also had to include the war disclaimer - “Before completing action, the House approved the amendment that provides $70 billion in funding for continued military operations in Iraq. The amendment was opposed by Congressman Steve Kagen.”
And at the bottom of each of the eleven Kohl press releases was a little line that was some version of:
“The Interior Appropriations Bill [fill in the blank with the name of the proper section of the huge bill] which contains the funding, has passed both chambers of Congress and now goes to the President to be signed into law. The project amount reflects a 1.56% [again, fill in the blank] across-the-board Administration cut in funding.”
I’m sorry that your project amount had to be cut – but so did everybody else’s in this very, very, very messy process we call budgeting here in Washington. Give me a break.
COMMENTS
Who shall be the sacrificial lamb? Earmarks (pork) has been going on for a long time. To the current Congress's credit at least they are disclosed more than in the past. But what congressman would dare to refuse to bring home the bacon especially in a district that citizen could be contested? None of course. The fact is that we voters just hate earmarks in someone else's district but the very worthy project in our district is not really an earmark. Layered on top of all this is the fact that there is very little money for anything other than entitlements and the military. So, a little earmark makes the beneficiary feel a little better. Our system is broken and has been for some time. The fault dear citizen lies not in the congress but in ourselves. You are right on the money Dave. JE

dave allen (Thu Dec 20 07:33:43 2007)
Let's remember that there are huge expenditures in just about every budget that dwarf earmarks. The "farm bill" is one example of giving huge market distorting subsidies to private industry. The oil and gas tax tax "incentives" are another. As much as I dislike earmarks I can say that at least most of them are listed specifically and for what they are---gifts to each community. At least earmarks are not disguised like the plethora of corporate welfare is.

dave allen (Thu Dec 20 07:56:39 2007)
The earmark debate is a distraction. The real issues are taxes and spending.
All else being equal, I'd much rather have my elected representative designate where the money goes than an Executive branch accounting troll. Ok, I buy it. So with earmarks, how do you get the spending prioritized, debated in light of the countless (Really. infinite...) sources for government money? Of course, as you indicate, how does that get handled by some Executive branch accounting troll? How do we get any - no, ALL - of US to stop asking for more money? JE

Brian Heyer (Thu Dec 20 09:08:53 2007)
how do we prioritize? I am not optimistic. This country has drifted quite a bit from rational discussions of important issues. I believe part of the reason is that we are so wealthy and powerful that we can afford to philosophical rather than practical. Why else would we debate whether or not evolution is a fact while ignoring many of the problems we face. We have so much waste (health care, excess military spending, war in Iraq, corporate welfare, earmarks etc). If we were taxed for what we spend rather than borrowing it from the Chinese. If we were a poor country. We would make more rational choices. The Republican idea (popularized by Reagan) that the federal government is wasteful and can only be restrained by starving it has merit for forcing choices.....but only if you don't borrow the money.

dave allen (Thu Dec 20 13:26:54 2007)
Yup, I agree. I don't agree that America be debt-free, as there are long-lived assets that arguably should be borrowed for. But no, certainly not to support continued deficit budgeting.
No backbone. Too spoiled. Too used to the government being the answer instead of private initiative. Too used to asking our representative to solve the problem, instead of going out and solving it ourselves. My choice for president hinges on he who is honest with Americans, who tells us to solve our own problems. Gets the government the heck out of the way. You know the spiel....

Jo E. (Thu Dec 20 13:39:29 2007)
I know. It's solved with a "veto." But where was Bush? In the same special interest pockets.

Jack Lohman (Fri Dec 21 07:54:09 2007)
Yup, where was Bush? Apparently 60% of earmarks go to Dems this year and 40% to Reps. I don't know what it was in previous years but I suspect the ratios were reversed at least and the costs even higher. Bush will veto health insurance for kids but not earmarks. Why? because he (Republicans) need the votes as much as Democrats.

dave allen (Sat Dec 22 10:08:07 2007)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|