fox cities news, appleton, wi
foxpolitics.netwhats really going on in the fox cities
fox cities newsfox cities news, appleton, wi


Blogroll
Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America
fox cities news, appleton, wi fox cities news, appleton, wi
Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Blogs
  • Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)
  • Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)
  • Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)
  • FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)
  • Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)
  • Education done right (1/27/2011)
  • To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)
  • (more)



    5/13/2008
    Lance Burri: I guess I'm a public enemy too

    The Press Gazette headline blared: “Local lawmakers make ‘public enemies’ list.”

    Nixonian, isn’t it? Very J. Edgar Hooverish. And all in the name of honest, open government.

    The “list” was put together by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign (WDC), an organization that promotes strict campaign finance laws: less money, unless it's taxpayer money. To be named an “enemy,” a lawmaker had to vote against several bills the WDC supported. Fifty-four of them did.

    I’ll tell you a secret: limiting campaign money doesn’t guarantee honest politicians and above-the-table governance. In fact, I’d argue that it does exactly the opposite.

    Why? The Laws of Supply and Demand. They apply.

    Here’s how: one of those Laws states that at any given demand, a decrease in supply means an increase in value, or in price, of the product in question.

    In this case, the “product” is campaign contributions. The “price” is influence. The bigger the contribution, the more influence the contributor gets in return. WDC says that’s unfair, un-American, and a rotten way to run a representative democracy. In all honesty, I agree.

    So campaign finance reformers (CFRers) like them say we have to limit supply, to cut down on influence!

    But it doesn’t work that way. Look, a bologna sandwich is just a bologna sandwich. I can’t stand it. Wouldn't pay for it. Won’t eat it. But if I’m ever stranded on a desert island, one bologna sandwich will be worth a lot.

    Restrict supply enough, and anything can be worth a fortune.

    So. Let’s say an Assembly candidate needs $50,000 to run a campaign. Not unheard of. The maximum individual contribution to an Assembly campaign is $500, so that candidate needs 100 people willing to contribute $500 each.

    That’s a lot of people. Plus, any salesman will tell you: you’ll only close a sale about 10% of the time. So that candidate has to contact at least 1,000 people to get those 100 contributions.

    That’s a lot of work. A lot of time. A lot of stress, performing a task that most of us absolutely hate.

    And if CFRers had their way, it would be even more work, time and stress, because it would be even harder to raise that much money.

    Which, in turn, will make you willing to do more to get it.

    There's more: if it’s hard for an established politician to raise big money, it’s even harder for an unknown challenger to do so. Making it easier to raise money means more competitive races.

    It also reduces temptation. Why should an honest candidate feel pressured to accept a quid pro quo, when there’s plenty of money available elsewhere? On the flip side, when money is hard to come by, a crooked candidate has the advantage over an honest one.

    So is relaxing or removing limits “the solution?” Yes and no. It’ll lessen the “price” of a contribution, and level the playing field for challengers and honest would-be candidates.

    But it isn’t a guarantee. There’s money in politics. There’s power in politics. As long as those things are true, politics will attract corruption.

    There is no guaranteed “solution:” there’s only accountability, the attentiveness of voters, and a system of government that wisely makes it really hard to enact new legislation.

    If we can’t stamp out corruption in government, we can at least reduce the incentive to become corrupt, and lower the bar for a successful challenge.

    It is, at least, worth a look. But it goes against the script, and that’ll get me labeled an “enemy,” too.




    fox cities news, appleton, wi

    sign up to receive fox politics news
    see todays issue


    Blog Archives
    2011
    June
    March
    January
    2010
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2009
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2008
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2007
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2006
    December
    November
    October
    September
    2000
    May

    Site Map | Privacy Policy   •   FoxPolitics ©2006 All Rights Reserved.   •   Site Updated 6/19/2013