|
 |


6/5/2008
Wigderson: Politicians pointing fingers in Janesville
The General Motors plant in Janesville is closing in 2010 and the politicians are doing what politicians do best: pointing fingers, posing for pictures, issuing press releases. If they have given us a reason not to look to them for a solution, perhaps we should thank them.
For seven years in the 1990s, my day job was working for a mid-sized trucking company as a logistics planner/dispatcher. The company lived and died on automotive freight because it paid well, especially just-in-time freight.
July was always a tough month for the trucking industry because that was when the auto industry would do their temporary shut downs to re-tool at the plants for the coming year. Every year the trucking company where I worked would lay people off, scramble for non-automotive freight, and generally lose money with the hope that the expanded opportunities of the next year would cover the losses for the current year. “Why don’t we diversify?” Because when the auto industry was up and running, there were never enough trucks and drivers to be had to cover all the available freight. The trucking company essentially lived life like the ancient farmers along the Nile River waiting for the flood to subside.
Eventually the company folded (fortunately, after I left), the victim of its own decisions, unable to compete with each cycle of climbing fuel prices and living with the turmoil of the auto industry. General Motors Janesville was the company’s biggest customer. When it thrived, the trucking company thrived. There are going to be a lot of companies that thrived when General Motors Janesville thrived that suddenly will have to either find new business models or else fold. It’s a rough economic world out there, and living in high-tax, anti-business Wisconsin doesn’t help.
I had to shake my head in wonder when I saw blogger Mike Mathias blaming the downfall of the plant in Janesville on the lack of universal health care. I mourn for the days when progressives like Mathias were against government (paid for by us) subsidizing big, bad corporations like General Motors.
But while Mathias may miss the larger picture, Governor Doyle may actually have this one right. He said,
“GM made it clear that this was a plant that they were invested in. They brought Barack Obama here just months ago. It was clear that this plant was the pride of GM.
“But, it should have been obvious long ago that the future was not where GM was headed. Bad corporate decisions kept these lines turning out gas guzzlers as fuel prices went from 2 dollars to 3 dollars and now to 4 dollars per gallon.
“Now we stand here, carrying the burden of those bad corporate decisions – failed leadership that culminated in a calculation that left out the very heart of this company, the workers who built it.”
Sometimes business leaders make bad choices, and there are economic consequences. General Motors is trying to fix theirs before it gets out of hand and brings the company down. The difference between the trucking company that once kept General Motors moving and General Motors itself is the tragic scale of the loss.
James Wigderson blogs regularly at Wigderson Library and Pub.
COMMENTS
James,
Very well written and poignant. I would also add that we all(Americans) made bad decisions. We all knew the party would end but right up until the end (and I believe it is the end of big vehicles for those who don't need them)we insisted that fuel economy standards were anti business. GM and the unions were more than happy to have their bloated operating costs (yes, including healthcare) so long as the profitable big cars still lined their coffers. Meanwhile, the non-US manufacturers patiently planned for the future, building their profitability on a solid consistent philosophy. So here we are, the miracle of the market has adjusted and chosen the winners for now. The sad part is that it didn't have to be so. Capitalism is very wasteful, tremendous resources are lost when the weak perish and the strong survive. But, unlike evolution, the participants have it within their power to foresee the future and plan and instead of being wasteful. Companies can be more efficient through that planning. GM and Ford didn't plan. They went after short term profits. But didn't Wallstreet in the process? Didn't we all? Does the average American think of overseas oil as being "our oil". I'm afraid so.

dave allen (Thu Jun 05 12:40:33 2008)

emily matthews (Fri Jun 06 12:44:24 2008)
Dave, as a developer, aren't you going after short-term profits?
I'm tired of seeing farms turned into wasteful subdivisions fille dwith irresponsible people who let their dogs loose to chase livestock, or who imagine they have a "right" not to smell manure.
Due to govt interference, farmers' income went from 60% parity down to 20-something now. Gov't would like to stranglwe us to death; no wonder so many small farms are folding due to over-regulation. WI has lost a massive amount of farmland. The US now importss more food than esports it.
So, aren't developers making a "bad choice" by wastefully eating up our farms?

emily matthews (Fri Jun 06 12:49:41 2008)
Emily,
Firstly,I only develop commercial property, not homes. But would I develop homes? Yes of course. Would I comply with the law? Absolutely. If there is an issue with development the laws should change. I'm sure you know however that farming is complicated. The loss of family farms is in part, a consequence of industrial agriculture. Family farms cannot compete in commodity pricing with mega farms. The developer has nothing to do with putting family farms out of business. I say this because I know of many grateful farmers who couldn't compete and were happy to sell to a developer, making far more than they could by farming. They were lucky because they had a way out. The unlucky ones are the farmers who can't compete but have only farmland. They will lose out to the mega farms. Simple economics Emily. By the way, as a developer I don't get subsidies to keep me in business, farmers do.

dave allen (Fri Jun 06 16:38:06 2008)
Emily,
Now to the first part of your post. Why do you attack me so? If you disagree with my position on short term vs long term profits for GM please say so and state your reasoning. I do not believe that any large industrial enterprise can survive for a long time on a perpetual short term profit view. Do you believe it to be otherwise? If so, please state your reason and connection to GM.

dave allen (Fri Jun 06 16:42:28 2008)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|