fox cities news, appleton, wi
foxpolitics.netwhats really going on in the fox cities
fox cities newsfox cities news, appleton, wi


Blogroll
Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America
fox cities news, appleton, wi fox cities news, appleton, wi
Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Blogs
  • Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)
  • Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)
  • Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)
  • FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)
  • Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)
  • Education done right (1/27/2011)
  • To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)
  • (more)



    6/26/2008
    Wigderson: Politicization of the court - on steroids

    Wisconsin State Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson is already out there fundraising for the April 2009 election. Abrahamson does not yet have a declared opponent, but she has never run for re-election without opposition.

    Unlike her past races, 2009 promises to be a difficult challenge for the chief justice. The recent trend is against her. Michael Gableman’s election over Louis Butler and Annette Ziegler’s election over Linda Clifford have demonstrated the public’s preference for judges who are not judicial activists.

    Of course, Abrahamson’s campaign and her allies are aware of the trend. After the last Supreme Court race, some even tried to start a movement to end Supreme Court elections altogether. They wanted justices to be appointed by a body of lawyers and judges rather than held accountable to the general public. Fortunately this idea gained no traction beyond the increasingly liberal editorial page of the Wisconsin State Journal.

    Abrahamson’s first fundraising letter is an attempt to demonstrate bi-partisan support for her re-election bid. Most disappointing to see on board the Abrahamson campaign is former Governor Scott McCallum, a Republican who should know better.

    But no claim of bi-partisan support is going to protect Abrahamson from the likely onslaught of third-party advertisements, just as any Abrahamson opponent can expect third-party attacks as well. As liberal judicial philosophy becomes increasingly outcome-based rather than on the specific intent of the law and the state constitution, interest groups have an increased incentive to attempt influencing the outcomes of judicial elections.

    Abrahamson has been at the forefront of the politicization of the court and the court’s decisions. It will not be surprising to see an all-out effort on both sides by special interest groups to control the terms of debate in next spring’s election.

    After all, if given the choice of trying to elect a majority of 50 members of the state assembly (of 99 total) and 17 members of the state senate (of 33 total), or electing four members of the state supreme court (of seven total) and electing them one at a time, most special interests are going to prefer trying to enact their agendas through the state supreme court. This is the consequence of the liberal judicial philosophy of outcome-based decision making as it is embodied by Shirley Abrahamson.

    James Wigderson blogs regularly at Wigderson Library & Pub.


    COMMENTS

    Shirley Abrahamson may not have an opponent yet, but the name calling has already begun.

    James Wigderson blithely labels Chief Justice Arahamson a "judicial activist," which is shorthand among some folks for "a judge who won't take orders from WMC."

    Wet-behind-the-ears political commentators may have some play book they're already using for the coming campaign.

    Those of us who have been around for a few years and have watched and read Supreme Court decisions for decades know that Chief Justice Abrahamson doesn't fit into glib stereotypes.

    One case, which immediately comes to mind because I reread it on the 25th anniversary of the decision, was Town of Fitchburg v. City of Madison (332 N.W. 2d 782 (1983), in which the Supreme Court disregarded legislative intent and the requirements of the law to declare Fitchburg a city under a law that was written for the then-town of Oak Creek to incorporate because it was adjacent to Milwaukee.

    Chief Justice Abrahamson, on the losing side of the 4-3 decision, ripped the court majority for blindly going where no court had gone before. The other side even overturned its own earlier decision that Fitchburg wasn't a city. Justice Abrahamson's dissent is worth reading today if you want to know how judicial activism works.

    Less than a year later, the Legislature came back and said it really meant what it said when it passed the Oak Creek Law in 1955.

    That's why Fitchburg is an only child today -- no other towns next door to Madison were allowed to incorporate -- and is the beneficiary of judicial activism from four justices other than Shirley Abrahamson.

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Rich Eggleston (Thu Jun 26 10:23:33 2008)

    Oh yes, Gableman’s and Annette Ziegler’s election is a triumph of judicial conservatism? Perhaps if incompetence and unethical behavior is judicial conservatism. This blog is another example of the labeling and name calling that has nothing to do with the facts and nuances. We should get rid of electing judges if the knee jerk voters continue to dominate judicial elections. Who anyway has the expertise to determine a qualified judge? Not the public surely.
    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    dave allen (Thu Jun 26 17:20:04 2008)




    fox cities news, appleton, wi

    sign up to receive fox politics news
    see todays issue


    Blog Archives
    2011
    June
    March
    January
    2010
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2009
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2008
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2007
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2006
    December
    November
    October
    September
    2000
    May

    Site Map | Privacy Policy   •   FoxPolitics ©2006 All Rights Reserved.   •   Site Updated 5/21/2013