|
 |


6/26/2008
Wigderson: Politicization of the court - on steroids
Wisconsin State Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson is already out there fundraising for the April 2009 election. Abrahamson does not yet have a declared opponent, but she has never run for re-election without opposition.
Unlike her past races, 2009 promises to be a difficult challenge for the chief justice. The recent trend is against her. Michael Gableman’s election over Louis Butler and Annette Ziegler’s election over Linda Clifford have demonstrated the public’s preference for judges who are not judicial activists.
Of course, Abrahamson’s campaign and her allies are aware of the trend. After the last Supreme Court race, some even tried to start a movement to end Supreme Court elections altogether. They wanted justices to be appointed by a body of lawyers and judges rather than held accountable to the general public. Fortunately this idea gained no traction beyond the increasingly liberal editorial page of the Wisconsin State Journal.
Abrahamson’s first fundraising letter is an attempt to demonstrate bi-partisan support for her re-election bid. Most disappointing to see on board the Abrahamson campaign is former Governor Scott McCallum, a Republican who should know better.
But no claim of bi-partisan support is going to protect Abrahamson from the likely onslaught of third-party advertisements, just as any Abrahamson opponent can expect third-party attacks as well. As liberal judicial philosophy becomes increasingly outcome-based rather than on the specific intent of the law and the state constitution, interest groups have an increased incentive to attempt influencing the outcomes of judicial elections.
Abrahamson has been at the forefront of the politicization of the court and the court’s decisions. It will not be surprising to see an all-out effort on both sides by special interest groups to control the terms of debate in next spring’s election.
After all, if given the choice of trying to elect a majority of 50 members of the state assembly (of 99 total) and 17 members of the state senate (of 33 total), or electing four members of the state supreme court (of seven total) and electing them one at a time, most special interests are going to prefer trying to enact their agendas through the state supreme court. This is the consequence of the liberal judicial philosophy of outcome-based decision making as it is embodied by Shirley Abrahamson.
James Wigderson blogs regularly at Wigderson Library & Pub.
COMMENTS
Shirley Abrahamson may not have an opponent yet, but the name calling has already begun.
James Wigderson blithely labels Chief Justice Arahamson a "judicial activist," which is shorthand among some folks for "a judge who won't take orders from WMC."
Wet-behind-the-ears political commentators may have some play book they're already using for the coming campaign.
Those of us who have been around for a few years and have watched and read Supreme Court decisions for decades know that Chief Justice Abrahamson doesn't fit into glib stereotypes.
One case, which immediately comes to mind because I reread it on the 25th anniversary of the decision, was Town of Fitchburg v. City of Madison (332 N.W. 2d 782 (1983), in which the Supreme Court disregarded legislative intent and the requirements of the law to declare Fitchburg a city under a law that was written for the then-town of Oak Creek to incorporate because it was adjacent to Milwaukee.
Chief Justice Abrahamson, on the losing side of the 4-3 decision, ripped the court majority for blindly going where no court had gone before. The other side even overturned its own earlier decision that Fitchburg wasn't a city. Justice Abrahamson's dissent is worth reading today if you want to know how judicial activism works.
Less than a year later, the Legislature came back and said it really meant what it said when it passed the Oak Creek Law in 1955.
That's why Fitchburg is an only child today -- no other towns next door to Madison were allowed to incorporate -- and is the beneficiary of judicial activism from four justices other than Shirley Abrahamson.

Rich Eggleston (Thu Jun 26 10:23:33 2008)
Oh yes, Gableman’s and Annette Ziegler’s election is a triumph of judicial conservatism? Perhaps if incompetence and unethical behavior is judicial conservatism. This blog is another example of the labeling and name calling that has nothing to do with the facts and nuances. We should get rid of electing judges if the knee jerk voters continue to dominate judicial elections. Who anyway has the expertise to determine a qualified judge? Not the public surely.

dave allen (Thu Jun 26 17:20:04 2008)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|