fox cities news, appleton, wi
foxpolitics.netwhats really going on in the fox cities
fox cities newsfox cities news, appleton, wi


Blogroll
Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America
fox cities news, appleton, wi fox cities news, appleton, wi
Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Blogs
  • Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)
  • Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)
  • Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)
  • FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)
  • Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)
  • Education done right (1/27/2011)
  • To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)
  • (more)



    10/2/2009
    Cap and Trade. Always follow the money

    Follow the money. Always follow the money. A revealing article from the Heritage Foundation this week links to “a tremendous synopsis” of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill.

    Heritage includes “one particularly revealing part” of the paper, A Federal Leviathan: The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 is a comparison of generous handouts in the bill – and it’s very clear that not every industry comes out a winner.

    What the bill does is “hand out” generous allowances to some industries to fund carbon emissions costs created by the bill. Electric utilities, natural gas distributors and “energy-intensive, trade-exposed industries” fare very well. Those in the refining and petroleum products industry are huge losers. (As of course, are we – Heritage reminds us of their calculation that cap-and-trade will cost the average family of four $3,000 a year.)

    Moonbattery (h/t Dad29) shares similar revelations from the Institute for Energy Research. It’s a good article.

    "The Waxman-Markey bill distributes roughly $778 billion in free emission allowances to various politically favored industries and others between 2012 and 2020, at the direct expense of non-favored industries and U.S. consumers. The ultimate impact of this giveaway of emission allowances is to transform the already regressive gross burden of a cap-and-trade system into a highly regressive federal climate policy that effectively redistributes tens of billions of dollars per year from low- and middle-income households to high-income shareholders." [Emphases mine.]

    Translation, the bill is set up to increase taxes on the middle-class and transfer those taxes to politically-connected industries.
    Another key mouthpiece for U.S. business interests – the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - has taken a strong stance against Waxman-Markey “because it would not reduce the global level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere” and because
    There should be a comprehensive legislative solution that does not harm the economy, recognizes that the problem is international in scope, and aggressively promotes new technologies and efficiency. Protecting our economy and the environment for future generations are mutually achievable goals.
    In important announcements, four companies announced in the last week they will not be renewing their U.S. Chamber of Commerce memberships.

    Exelon, Nike, Pacific Gas & Electric, PNM Resources.

    Yup, look at the chart from the “Federal Leviathan” – all are Waxman-Markey winners.

    Not so coincidentally, all also were members of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (US CAP) that wrote the blueprint for Waxman-Markey.

    Look for possible U.S. Chamber-related actions from other US CAP members, including Caterpillar, GE, Johnson & Johnson, Siemens, Alcoa, Dow Chemical, Deere & Company and Duke Energy.

    Funny. The corporations don’t say anything about friendly Waxman-Markey money in revealing their split with the U.S. Chamber. For them, it’s all about “climate change and the critical need for urgent action.”

    Indeed. Follow the money.

    Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net




    COMMENTS

    More on Cap & Trade...

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Joe (Fri Oct 02 06:41:30 2009)

    Geez, Jo, you finally found something we agree on. Cap and trade makes sense in time, but not now. it will drive companies to outsource jobs to other that do not have C&T. Our CEOs don't care about "right," they care about their salaries and bonuses (profits), and the workers will take the hit. Only when C&T becomes a worldwide requirement will it make sense.

    And though you only seem concerned when Dems roll over to the special interests, "follow the money" is a bipartisan problem that must be fixed if this country is going to recover. Corrupt governments are not sustainable.

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Jack Lohman (Fri Oct 02 08:27:08 2009)

    Jack, I don't recall Jo saying it was OK if the corruption came from the Republocrtas...what we need are STATESMEN, not Politicians.
    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    emily matthews (Fri Oct 02 17:07:40 2009)

    I agree, Emily, but politicians (both R's and D's) are funded by special interests and statesmen are funded by the public infrastructure. That's why we need public funding of campaigns. Then you wouldn't have to "follow the money."
    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Jack Lohman (Fri Oct 02 20:19:01 2009)

    I would agree with some of the commentary here, but for one factoid: Global warming is a hoax!

    Destroying our national economy and making America a third world country over a hoax like this is a travesty.

    We need statesmen that will call this scam what it is - a taxing scam.

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Duke (Sun Oct 04 18:53:08 2009)




    fox cities news, appleton, wi

    sign up to receive fox politics news
    see todays issue


    Blog Archives
    2011
    June
    March
    January
    2010
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2009
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2008
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2007
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2006
    December
    November
    October
    September
    2000
    May

    Site Map | Privacy Policy   •   FoxPolitics ©2006 All Rights Reserved.   •   Site Updated 5/20/2013