FoxPolitics.net - Appleton, WI News - What's really going on in the Fox Cities

FoxPolitics.net Blogs

FoxPolitics News

Local/State Govt Links

Salaries

• Appleton School District, 2007-08
• City of Appleton
• Town of Grand Chute
• City of Menasha
• City of Neenah

Candidates

City of Appleton

• Elected Officials
• Salary Watch
• Directory
• Mtg. Agendas/Minutes

Advisory Board

Blogroll

Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America

Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Search Archives

Blogs

Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)

Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)

Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)

FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)

Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)

Education done right (1/27/2011)

To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)

(more)

10/15/2010
Will Harry Reid keep his seat?

I watched the Angle-Reid debate last night, intrigued at the possibility of an issues fist fight of sorts. Chris Cillizza touted the match as a must-see event for the nation (well, the political crazies anyway) and for me, it didn’t disappoint. (Politico interestingly, labeled the results a dud.)

I’m really swamped with campaign work, so instead of making the time to write up my thoughts, I’m including those of Ira Stoll below, which pretty well reflect my impressions from last night. I loved it. Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net

The Republican candidate for Senate in Nevada, Sharron Angle, scored victories in both substance and style in an hourlong nationally televised debate with the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid.

On the substance, Ms. Angle emerged as a champion of the Constitution, faulting Mr. Reid for backing "unconstitutional bills like ObamaCare," invoking Nevada's "Tenth Amendment Rights" to control its education dollars, and reminding Mr. Reid, her Democratic opponent, that, "our founding fathers knew that the best government was a limited government." She framed the choice for voters as between Harry Reid and "big government" and herself and "limited, Constitutional government."

On the style, Ms. Angle appeared younger and more vigorous than Mr. Reid, who fumbled several times. At one point, Mr. Reid described the Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore (he called it "Gore versus Bush") decision as 5 to 4 when in fact significant elements were decided on a 7 to 2 basis and the opinion was issued "per curiam," or for the entire court. Another time, he referred to the "Department of Energy" when the question was about the department of education. He spent several awkward seconds of valuable debate time going into great detail about the mechanics of a colonoscopy (don't ask.)

Ms. Angle challenged him directly and repeatedly: "Man up, Harry Reid," she said at one point, asking the senator why Americans shouldn't have personal retirement accounts as part of Social Security like those that senators have. At another point, criticizing Mr. Reid for having demoralized the troops for saying that the Iraq war "is lost," she said, "you need to apologize to them."

Each candidate had a few surprising moments. Ms. Angle faulted President Reagan for his immigration policy: "He had it wrong when he gave amnesty in '86," she said. Asked about the Supreme Court, Senator Reid praised Justice Antonin Scalia and also Justice Byron White, who dissented from Roe v. Wade. Ms. Angle, who as a general matter called for less government spending, faulted Mr. Reid and ObamaCare for having "cut half a trillion dollars out of Medicare right at the point where seniors need."

Overall, though, the debate was a robust contest between two different philosophies of government and theories of economics. Ms. Angle called for less government taxing, regulating, and spending. Mr. Reid railed against "big banks," "those greedy bankers on Wall Street," oil companies, and "insurance companies," which he said "have almost destroyed our economy."

Ms. Angle tried some class warfare against Mr. Reid, opening: "Senator Reid lives in the Ritz-Carlton in Washington, D.C.," and asking him, "How did you become so wealthy on a government payroll?"

"The solutions to the health care....are the free market," she said, questioning the wisdom of requiring insurance policies to pay for specific procedures such as mammograms or colonoscopies. "America is a country of choices, not forcing people to buy things they don't need," she said.

Mr. Reid fired back by denouncing what he said was Ms. Angle's "extreme idea," and by insisting, "she simply doesn't understand what went on in Washington."

Ms. Angle defended her call for eliminating the federal Department of Education, saying she had served as a teacher for 25 years. "We send out money to Washington D.C. to be skimmed off by 6,000 bureaucrats" and then returned with unfunded mandates, she said.

In a to-and-fro over extending the Bush tax cuts, Ms. Angle's line was, "It's not the federal government's money, it's our money."

All in all, it was a night that seemed to throw some serious doubt over the New York Times's primary night assessment of Ms. Angle's victory, which was as follows, and should be clipped and saved for election night should Ms. Angle pull off the victory that is indicated by recent polls showing her with a narrow lead:

The nomination of Ms. Angle could provide a boost to Mr. Reid's hopes, and Mr. Reid's aides said they were preparing to seize on positions she has taken to try to portray her as out of touch with most Nevada voters. For example, she has called for the privatization of Social Security, the elimination of the Department of Energy, and cutting back regulation on Wall Street, all positions that could give Mr. Reid's well-financed campaign ammunition to use in television advertisements against her. She also does not have the organization or financial resources that Mr. Reid is bringing to the race.

Ira Stoll is the editor of Future of Capitalism.

COMMENTS

When I read this: "Mr. Reid railed against "big banks," "those greedy bankers on Wall Street," oil companies, and "insurance companies," which he said "have almost destroyed our economy." I thought for a moment I was deep into Atlas Shrugged, reading a line of drivel from Mr. Wesley Mouch.

Andrew Ellis (Fri Oct 15 08:34:30 2010)

Reid is a major part of the problem and should join the unemployed. But replaced by wacko Sharon Angle? I hope not.

Jack Lohman (Fri Oct 15 09:00:28 2010)

Ooh, so who is the better evil?

Jo (Fri Oct 15 09:22:54 2010)

A third party, but our election rules are stacked against that.

Jack Lohman (Fri Oct 15 09:25:39 2010)

Why Libertarians Should Hold Their Nose and Vote for Sharron Angle

"As the midterm elections approach, many libertarians are asking what outcome they should wish for," writes The Daily Beast's Tunku Varadarajan. While his first instinct is for "Republican victories everywhere" to "get rid of the big-government Democrats—i.e., all of them," the question remains of whether or not it's okay to back Tea Party candidates like Carl Paladino and Christine O'Donnell—"people we wouldn't ask home to dinner, except in a Dinner for Schmucks sense." But although Nevada's Sharron Angle is one of the most conservative, hard-line, and distasteful Tea Party candidates, "the political and symbolic importance of defeating Reid" —the Democratic Senate Majority Leader and close adviser to Obama—"is so great that its imperative trumps all distaste," Varadarajan says. "Reid, to libertarian eyes, is the incarnation of our big-government malaise. If he survives, all our hearts will sink and the world will go dark."

Read it at The Daily Beast

Jack Lohman (Fri Oct 15 09:40:26 2010)

Post a Reply

Print this Article

Email Article to a Friend